Our three guests bring lucidity as well as expertise to a question that has been
muddled by generations of editorialists and defense lawyers. RLS: "The insanity
defense really grew out of the attempt by judges three hundred years ago and more to try to explain to juries a very simple concept, and that is that all crimes require not only an act but a certain state of mind... One who is so dispossessed of reason that he cannot form that intent obviously cannot be guilty of a crime." ... WWM: "I think it's important to differentiate between explaining why behavior takes place and excusing it. ... People tend to take explanations to be equated with excusing, and that's why psychiatry sometimes gets a bad mark."
- Hoover ID: Program S0598
- Print item record
- Download item record
- Download low resolution copy
- Order high resolution copy Add to My Collections






